Skip to main content

Drum Dermatome — Padgett-Hood

The Padgett-Hood dermatome is a drum-type skin-grafting instrument that represents the commercially refined version of the original Padgett drum dermatome (1939), produced by Hood Laboratories. It was the first instrument capable of harvesting calibrated, uniform-thickness split-thickness skin grafts — a transformational advance over the freehand Humby knife and the antecedent Reverdin / Ollier-Thiersch razor-blade era. Largely supplanted by powered oscillating-blade dermatomes for routine STSG harvest, the Padgett-Hood retains defined contemporary niches in harvesting grafts from excised tissue specimens, very thick STSGs for joint surfaces, dermal grafts, and de-epithelialization of free flaps.[1][2]

Historical Context​

  • Earl Calvin Padgett (University of Kansas Medical Center plastic surgery chair, 1893–1946) imagined the device with help from George J. Hood (engineer at the University of Kansas).
  • Hood applied for the first patent in 1938; Padgett displayed a working model at a medical meeting in 1939.
  • Based on the adhesion-traction principle — the drum holds the skin in place by adhesive contact while a calibrated blade shaves the graft.
  • The Hood modification (Hood Laboratories) became the standard commercially available version, hence the combined name Padgett-Hood.[1]
  • A founding member of the American Board of Plastic Surgery called it "the greatest contribution in many decades to the technique of skin grafting."

Design​

  • Half-cylindrical metal drum that rotates as it is advanced across the donor site
  • Dermatome adhesive cement applied to the drum surface adheres the skin to the drum during rotation — provides the counter-traction necessary for a clean even cut[3]
  • Calibrated blade mounted alongside the drum with an adjustable gap between blade and drum surface
  • Thickness range typically 12/1,000–26/1,000 inches (0.012–0.026") depending on clinical need[2][4]
  • Manual operation — no power source

Mechanism​

The surgeon rolls the drum across the prepared lubricated donor site; the adhesive pulls the skin onto the drum, and the blade shaves a uniform sheet at the set thickness. Brody 1979 published specific suggestions to facilitate use and care, particularly the maintenance of the drum and blade assembly that determines long-term reliability.[5]

Reconstructive Use Cases — Modern Niche Applications​

The drum-with-adhesive design has surgical advantages that no powered dermatome can match, which keep the Padgett-Hood relevant for specific reconstructive scenarios:

1. Reused-Skin-Graft Technique (Donor-Site-Sparing)​

The single most distinctive contemporary application. Kuo & Ohara 2003 described the Padgett-Hood specifically for the "reused skin graft" technique in chronic gluteal hidradenitis suppurativa:[2]

  • After wide en-bloc excision of affected skin
  • The Padgett-Hood harvested STSGs from the excised skin specimen itself (set at 12–20/1,000")
  • Grafts then meshed 1.5× and applied to the surgical defect
  • No separate donor site needed
  • No recurrence during 8–36 mo follow-up

The technique exploits the unique drum-adhesive mechanic: the adhesive holds the excised tissue firmly against the drum even when it is not attached to a living donor site — something no powered dermatome can replicate.

GU translation: directly applicable to groin / perineal / scrotal hidradenitis excision and any large excisional reconstruction where reusing the excised skin would avoid a separate donor.

2. Very Thick STSGs for Mobile / Joint Surfaces​

Tang 2010 described the Padgett dermatome for harvesting very thick STSGs (0.024–0.026") for mobile burned-limb surfaces, where thicker grafts minimize joint contracture. Simple and time-saving in his series.[4]

GU translation: applicable when thick-graft coverage is needed over a mobile area in genital / perineal reconstruction.

3. Dermal Grafts​

Schaffer 1976 described the drum dermatome technique for obtaining dermal grafts with results equivalent to other mechanical methods.[6]

4. Radial Forearm Free-Flap Donor-Site Coverage​

Jaquet 2012 used the Padgett for 0.35–0.45 mm STSGs from the thigh to cover RFFF donor sites in head-and-neck reconstruction — translation to the phalloplasty RFFF donor site is direct.[7]

5. De-Epithelialization of Buried Flaps​

The same principle that drives the Padgett electric dermatome's free-flap de-epithelialization use applies to the drum: precise epidermal removal without damaging dermal blood supply. Relevant to buried phalloplasty flaps and any reconstructive context where a buried flap surface needs to be covered by recipient skin.

Advantages​

  • Excellent graft thickness uniformity — the fixed blade-to-drum gap is highly consistent, superior to freehand
  • Capable of very thick grafts (up to 0.026") — critical for mobile / joint surfaces[4]
  • Harvesting from excised tissue — the adhesive-drum mechanic uniquely supports the reused-graft technique[2]
  • No power source required — fully manual
  • Large continuous sheet the size of the drum surface

Limitations​

  • Adhesive cement requirement — proper application is essential and adds setup complexity[3]
  • Technically demanding — drum pressure, rotation speed, adhesive application all require experience
  • Slower than powered dermatomes for large-area routine harvest
  • Maintenance burden — careful care of the drum and blade assembly required to maintain performance[5]
  • Largely supplanted for routine harvesting by powered oscillating-blade dermatomes (Zimmer, Padgett electric)

Padgett-Hood vs Other Drum Dermatomes​

FeaturePadgett-HoodReeseOriginal Padgett (1939)
Drum typeHalf-cylindricalFull-cylindrical with tape squaresHalf-cylindrical
Adhesive systemDermatome cement on drumAdhesive tape squares on drumDermatome cement on drum
Graft shapeLarge sheet (drum-sized)Multiple small square graftsLarge sheet
Thickness calibrationAdjustable blade-drum gapAdjustable blade-drum gapAdjustable blade-drum gap
ManufacturerHood LaboratoriesVariousOriginal prototype
Current availabilityStill commercially availableLargely historicalHistorical

Padgett-Hood vs Modern Powered Dermatomes​

FeaturePadgett-Hood (drum)Zimmer Air / Padgett Electric
MechanismAdhesive drum + calibrated bladeOscillating blade with calibrated lever
Power sourceManualAir or electric
Setup timeHigher (adhesive application)Lower
Routine large-area harvestSlowerFaster — current standard
Reused-graft technique (excised tissue)Uniquely capable via adhesive grip[2]Not practical without living donor traction
Very thick STSG (up to 0.026")Reliable[4]Possible at upper dial range
Continuous sheet lengthLimited by drum dimensionLimited only by donor area

See also: Dermatome — Overview, Padgett Dermatome (the modern electric descendant), Zimmer Air Dermatome, Humby Dermatome, Goulian Dermatome, Skin Mesher, STSG.

References​

1. Singh M, Nuutila K, Collins KC, Huang A. "Evolution of skin grafting for treatment of burns: Reverdin pinch grafting to Tanner mesh grafting and beyond." Burns. 2017;43(6):1149–1154. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.015

2. Kuo HW, Ohara K. "Surgical treatment of chronic gluteal hidradenitis suppurativa: reused skin graft technique." Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(2):173–8. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29044.x

3. Speace GF, Lukash F. "How to take a graft as well as Earl C. Padgett." Ann Plast Surg. 1981;6(2):158–9.

4. Tang YW. "Simultaneous very thick split-thickness and split-thickness skin grafting for treating burned limbs." J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(5):822–5. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181eed464

5. Brody GS, Krugman ME. "More on the care and feeding of the Padgett dermatome." Ann Plast Surg. 1979;3(2):188–9. doi:10.1097/00000637-197908000-00019

6. Schaffer RI. "Dermal grafts: an alternative technique." Laryngoscope. 1976;86(11):1722–5. doi:10.1288/00005537-197611000-00017

7. Jaquet Y, Enepekides DJ, Torgerson C, Higgins KM. "Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft." Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(1):38–43. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.216