Skip to main content
Drogo K. Montague

Drogo K. Montague

🇺🇸 United States

Training and career​

  • Current position Urologist, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute1
  • Former position Surgeon, Cleveland Clinic Center for Genitourinary Reconstruction (2018)2

Montague worked on American Urological Association guidelines.3

Contributions​

Montague's cited work addresses artificial urinary sphincter implantation, penile prosthesis outcomes in transplant recipients, and corporoplasty for penile curvature. An earlier paper examines jejunal conduit urinary diversion.4567

  • 1996 AUA erectile dysfunction guideline (1996). Chaired the AUA panel that evaluated treatments for organic erectile dysfunction and issued practice recommendations.8
  • Prosthesis cylinder selection in Peyronie’s disease (1996). Compared AMS 700 CX and Ultrex cylinders for correcting deformity during penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease.9
  • Long-term artificial urinary sphincter outcomes (2001). Led a series assessing long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence.10

Cited on WARWIKI

4 publications with Drogo K. Montague as a listed author are cited on WARWIKI, ordered by the number of pages that cite them. Papers whose author list is shortened to "et al." before this name are not included.

  1. Sun AY, Babbar P, Gill BC, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Penile Prosthesis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Matched Cohort Study. Urology. 2018;117:86-88. doi
    Cited on: Preoperative Evaluation for Penile Prosthesis Implantation
  2. Montague DK. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in the Adult Male. In: Montague DK, Gill IS, Angermeier KW, Ross JH, eds. Textbook of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery. Informa Healthcare; 2008:392-398.
    Cited on: Artificial Urinary Sphincter (Procedure)
  3. Daitch JA, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Modified corporoplasty for penile curvature: long-term results and patient satisfaction. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2006–2009. doi
    Cited on: Tunica Plication for Peyronie's Disease
  4. Klein EA, Montie JE, Montague DK, Novick AC, Straffon RA. "Jejunal conduit urinary diversion." J Urol. 1986;135(2):244–246. doi
    Cited on: Renal Function & Metabolic Surveillance After Bowel-Based Reconstruction

Footnotes​

  1. find-doctor.ama-assn.org (5477741). Accessed October 2026. ↩

  2. Peyronie’s Disease Expert on ‘Erectile Insufficiency’ and New Guide to Safe Sex. Accessed October 2026. ↩

  3. AwardsArchive. Accessed October 2026. ↩

  4. Klein EA, Montie JE, Montague DK, Novick AC, Straffon RA. "Jejunal conduit urinary diversion." J Urol. 1986;135(2):244–246. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45598-4 ↩

  5. Montague DK. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in the Adult Male. In: Montague DK, Gill IS, Angermeier KW, Ross JH, eds. Textbook of Reconstructive Urologic Surgery. Informa Healthcare; 2008:392-398. ↩

  6. Sun AY, Babbar P, Gill BC, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Penile Prosthesis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Matched Cohort Study. Urology. 2018;117:86-88. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.048 ↩

  7. Daitch JA, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Modified corporoplasty for penile curvature: long-term results and patient satisfaction. J Urol. 1999;162(6):2006–2009. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68088-3 ↩

  8. Montague DK, Barada JH, Belker AM, et al. "Clinical Guidelines Panel on Erectile Dysfunction: Summary Report on the Treatment of Organic Erectile Dysfunction." Journal of Urology. 1996;156(6):2007–2011. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65419-3 ↩

  9. Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, et al. "AMS 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Men with Peyronie's Disease: Comparison of CX and Ultrex Cylinders." Journal of Urology. 1996;156(5):1633–1635. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65468-5 ↩

  10. MONTAGUE DK, ANGERMEIER KW, PAOLONE DR. "LONG-TERM CONTINENCE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION AFTER ARTIFICIAL SPHINCTER IMPLANTATION FOR URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATECTOMY." Journal of Urology. 2001;166(2):547–549. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65981-2 ↩