Cervical Cancer Screening
Cervical cancer screening is a well-established preventive strategy that can reduce the lifetime risk of cervical cancer from up to 5% in unscreened populations to less than 0.5% with effective screening and treatment of precancers.[1] Guidelines differ: ACS prefers primary hrHPV testing, while the current final USPSTF statement (2018; update in progress) includes three screening options for ages 30–65 without designating HPV testing as preferred.[2][3]
Screening methods
Three strategies are endorsed:[2]
- Primary HPV testing (preferred by ACS) — uses an FDA-approved hrHPV test alone. HPV-based testing is generally more sensitive than cytology, but accuracy and cancer outcomes depend on the assay, population, screening interval and follow-up pathway.[1][2]
- Cotesting — HPV testing combined with cytology. Provides increased sensitivity and long-term negative predictive value vs. cytology alone, but adds limited incremental benefit over HPV testing alone since 97% of precancers are HPV-positive.[1][2]
- Cytology alone (Pap test) — remains a recommended option under the final USPSTF statement; ACS reserves it for settings where other options are unavailable. Requires more frequent screening (every 3 years) due to lower sensitivity.[2]
Current guideline recommendations by age
| Age | USPSTF final 2018 | ACS 2025/2026 update |
|---|---|---|
| <21 years | No screening | No screening |
| 21–24 | Cytology every 3 years | No screening before age 25 |
| 25–29 | Cytology every 3 years | Primary HPV every 5 years (clinician-collected) or 3 years (self-collected) |
| 30–65 | HPV every 5 years, cotesting every 5 years, or cytology every 3 years | Clinician-collected HPV every 5 years preferred; self-collected HPV every 3 years, cotesting every 5 years or cytology every 3 years are alternatives |
| >65 | Discontinue with adequate prior negative results | Adequate negative results near ages 60 and 65, with the appropriate test-specific interval and no high-risk exception; see below |
| After hysterectomy with cervix removal | No screening if no history of CIN2+ or cervical cancer | Same |
Key points of agreement and divergence:
- Under 21 years, average risk — routine screening is not recommended.[2][4]
- Ages 21–24 — USPSTF recommends cytology every 3 years; ACS recommends no screening before age 25.[2]
- Ages 25–29 — USPSTF continues cytology every 3 years; ACS recommends primary HPV testing every 5 years (clinician-collected) or every 3 years (self-collected).[2]
- Ages 30–65 — distinguish ACS preference from the USPSTF final statement, which accepts HPV, cotesting or cytology at their respective intervals.[2]
- Over 65 — screening can be discontinued with adequate prior negative results. ACS now recommends a forward-looking approach: negative primary HPV testing (preferred) or negative cotesting at ages 60 and 65, with the final test at age 65 or older. Self-collected testing retains its three-year interval before exit; if HPV-based testing is unavailable, three appropriately spaced negative cytology tests are an alternative. These exit rules do not replace longer surveillance after CIN2+ or individualized high-risk screening.[2][5]
- After hysterectomy with cervix removal — no screening if no history of CIN2+ or cervical cancer.[2][4]
HPV self-collection — a major recent advance
The FDA approved the first self-collected vaginal specimens for HPV testing in clinical settings in May 2024, and the first at-home self-collection device (Teal Wand) in May 2025.[6][2]
- Self-collected and clinician-collected samples show similar accuracy for detecting high-grade cervical lesions (pooled overall agreement ~89%).[2][6]
- Clinician-collected specimens remain preferred because they allow reflex cytology from the same sample if HPV-positive. A positive self-collected result usually needs additional clinician evaluation; genotype and risk determine whether this is cytology/triage, colposcopy or another follow-up pathway.[6]
- After a negative self-collected HPV test, repeat screening is recommended in 3 years (vs. 5 years for clinician-collected) — a margin of safety while U.S. longitudinal data accrue.[2][6]
- Self-collection is not appropriate for immunocompromised patients, those with HIV, DES exposure, history of cervical cancer, or those requiring cytology-based surveillance.[6][3]
- HRSA’s update includes self-collection for average-risk ages 30–65 and applies to most covered plans beginning with plan years starting in 2027; it is not a universal January 1 change for every policy.[3][12]
Management of abnormal results — ASCCP risk-based framework
The 2019 ASCCP guidelines introduced a paradigm shift from results-based to risk-based management, using the estimated risk of CIN3+ (CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer) to guide clinical action:[1][7]
| Immediate CIN3+ risk | Recommended action |
|---|---|
| <4% | Surveillance (1, 3, or 5 years depending on result) |
| 4–24% | Colposcopy |
| 25–59% | Colposcopy or excisional treatment acceptable |
| ≥60% | Expedited excisional treatment without a prior confirmatory biopsy preferred when eligible |
Expedited-treatment thresholds apply to nonpregnant patients aged 25 or older, with shared decision-making about reproductive goals and treatment risks. Colposcopy at treatment still guides the procedure; symptoms or certain high-risk results can require evaluation outside the simplified table.[1][11]
A prior negative HPV test within 5 years reduces the CIN3+ risk by approximately 50% for new low-grade abnormalities, potentially allowing deferral of colposcopy.[7][8] After treatment for CIN2+, obtain three negative HPV tests or cotests at 6, 18 and 30 months before moving to three-year surveillance for at least 25 years.[7][13]
Special populations
HIV, transplant, systemic lupus erythematosus and some other immunosuppressive conditions or treatments require dedicated screening pathways. The schedule and test depend on age, diagnosis and therapy; not all patients with inflammatory bowel disease have the same risk, and cotesting is not required at every age (for example, younger patients with HIV use cytology-based screening). Do not extrapolate average-risk self-collection or screening-exit rules to these groups. Vaccination does not remove the need for indicated screening.[4][6][13][14]
Screening gaps and disparities
Despite effective screening, over 50% of cervical cancers in the U.S. are diagnosed in individuals overdue for screening.[9] Up-to-date screening rates have declined to approximately 75% and have not rebounded post-pandemic.[6] Disparities persist among uninsured, rural, and racial / ethnic minority populations — making self-collection a particularly promising strategy for these groups.[6][10]
See Also
- Cancer Screening — Breast.
- Cancer Screening — Endometrial.
- Opportunistic Adnexal Surgery — primary prevention of tubo-ovarian carcinoma.
References
1. Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Guido RS, Schiffman M. "Cervical cancer screening: a review." JAMA. 2023;330(6):547–558. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.13174
2. Wiser A, Quinlan JD. "Cervical cancer screening." Am Fam Physician. 2026;113(2):137–144.
3. Christine B, Bush M, Thurakal A, Sheehy AM. "New cervical cancer screening guidelines from the US Department of Health and Human Services." JAMA. 2026. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.26456
4. US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, et al. "Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement." JAMA. 2018;320(7):674–686. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.10897
5. American Cancer Society. "Screening for cervical cancer." CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;76(1):e70049. doi:10.3322/caac.70049
6. Perkins RB, Wolf AMD, Church TR, et al. "Self-collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing and guidance on screening exit: an update to the American Cancer Society cervical cancer screening guideline." CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;76(1):e70041. doi:10.3322/caac.70041
7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Chelmow D. Updated Guidelines for Management of Cervical Cancer Screening Abnormalities. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2024.
8. Espinosa K. "ASCCP management guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening." Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(3):275–276.
9. Winer RL, Lin J, Anderson ML, et al. "Strategies to increase cervical cancer screening with mailed human papillomavirus self-sampling kits: a randomized clinical trial." JAMA. 2023;330(20):1971–1981. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.21471
10. Montealegre JR, Hilsenbeck SG, Bulsara S, et al. "Self-collection for cervical cancer screening in a safety-net setting." JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185(9):1119–1127. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2971
11. ASCCP. Tips for Best Practice on Role of Expedited Treatment. 2024. Official practice pearl.
12. HRSA. Women's Preventive Services Guidelines: updated cervical cancer screening guidance and implementation by plan year. Official guidance.
13. Perkins RB, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Updates Through 2023. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2024;28:3–6. Full guideline update.
14. ASCCP. Updated Review for Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening in Immunosuppressed Women Without HIV Infection. 2025. Official guideline review.