Skip to main content

Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex

The bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex (BEEC) is a rare congenital spectrum of genitourinary malformations (prevalence ≈ 1 in 10,000 births) that demands lifelong multidisciplinary care. As childhood survivors reach adulthood in growing numbers, adult and transitional urology now carries an increasingly central role in their management.[1][2]

For the adult reconstructive urologist, BEEC is a problem of continence reconstruction that frequently outlasts the native bladder, of bowel incorporated into the urinary tract with its lifelong metabolic and oncologic consequences, of genital and abdominal-wall reconstruction, and of fertility, pregnancy, and psychosocial burden. Because the European consensus holds that these patients require lifelong follow-up at specialist centers, this article sits within Transitional Urology rather than under prolapse or incontinence.[2]

Spectrum and Overview​

BEEC spans a range of severity: isolated epispadias (mildest), classic bladder exstrophy (CBE), and cloacal exstrophy / OEIS complex (most severe). The defect involves the urinary tract, abdominal wall, musculoskeletal pelvis, pelvic floor, and genitalia — and sometimes the spine and anus.[1][3] Management is primarily surgical, beginning in the neonatal period, with the staged goals of abdominal-wall closure, urinary continence, renal preservation, and genital reconstruction.[1]

Urinary Continence and Lower Urinary Tract Function in Adults​

Continence is the dominant issue in transitional care, and most patients require multiple procedures over a lifetime.

  • Few void normally per urethra. Only ~25% of classic bladder exstrophy patients are expected to void per urethra without catheterization or diversion. A French long-term cohort (median follow-up 22 years) found only 21.4% voided spontaneously per urethra while 76.2% performed clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC).[4][5]
  • The need for augmentation or diversion rises with age — roughly 50% by age 10 and ~70% by age 18 in a 36-year multi-institutional cohort; among adults without diversion, 85.5% performed CIC.[6]
  • LUTS are common but under-recognized — moderate-to-severe symptoms in 80% of males and 67% of females, many apparent only on detailed validated questionnaires.[7]
  • Continence depends heavily on the procedure. After bladder neck closure with a continent catheterizable stoma, continence reaches 93%, versus 64% after isolated bladder neck reconstruction.[4]

Continence Surgery — Approach and Outcomes​

Selection depends on native-bladder safety, prior reconstruction, patient goals and ability to catheterize. These percentages come from heterogeneous observational cohorts, not randomized comparisons; they should not be used as individualized predictions.

ProcedureContinenceNotes
Bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) — modified Young-Dees-Leadbetter≈ 64% (≥3-hour dry interval)Most common technique; failure usually reflects inadequate capacity / compliance. No patient needing redo BNR voided per urethra without CIC[4][8]
BNR + augmentation cystoplasty ± continent catheterizable stomaHigher than isolated BNRAdded when capacity / compliance is insufficient; redo BNR is most effective combined with augmentation[5][6]
Bladder neck closure (BNC) + continent catheterizable stoma93% (95% CI 87–97%)Higher observed continence in the cited cohort; requires reliable lifelong catheterization and an adequately safe reservoir[4]
Endoscopic bulking (dextranomer / hyaluronic acid)5-yr failure-free 70% (male epispadias), 45% (female epispadias and exstrophy group)Better after prior BNR; a lower-morbidity adjunct[10]
Artificial urinary sphincter (AS792)91% (historical)Largely supplanted by reconstructive techniques[11]

Continent Urinary Diversion — Options and Long-Term Complications​

When the native bladder cannot be preserved or is inadequate, continent diversion is performed. These reservoirs commit the patient to lifelong surveillance.

  • Continent catheterizable pouches (Penn, Indiana, Mainz) — in a 25-patient untreated-adult series, 18 selected a continent pouch and all were continent at mean 6.5 years. A separate 33-patient benign-indication Indiana-pouch cohort, not specific to BEEC, had mean revision-free survival of 198 months, but 67% required at least one revision over median 258 months.[12][13]
  • Continent anal diversion — a 45-year experience reported 97% daytime continence, but with secondary rectal-reservoir malignancies, prophylactic alkaline substitution in 41%, and adverse sexual-function impact.[14]
  • Ileal conduit — the simplest option for patients with limited healthcare access, inability or preference not to perform self-catheterization, or significant comorbidity; malignancy can still arise in the conduit decades later.[12][15]
  • Stomal stenosis is the most common long-term stomal complication (25% at median 1.9 years). Monofilament rather than multifilament umbilicoplasty suture was associated with less stenosis in the retrospective study (p = 0.009); scar contractures respond to stomal incision, keloids to excision and local tissue rearrangement.[16]
  • Bladder / pouch calculi form in 26% of continent diversions — co-leading long-term complication alongside stomal stenosis.[17]
  • A mixed-diagnosis cohort of 173 catheterizable channels had a 53% revision rate at median 12.4 years; revision does not necessarily mean loss of the channel.[9]

Augmentation Cystoplasty — Metabolic and Renal Monitoring​

Any bowel segment incorporated into the urinary tract obliges lifelong metabolic surveillance:[18]

  • Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis — the most common metabolic complication, particularly with ileal or colonic segments; monitor bicarbonate and treat clinically relevant acidosis; routine prophylaxis is not necessary for every reconstruction.
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency — risk depends on ileal location/length, prior resection and time since surgery; no single length threshold excludes risk. Monitor B12 over lifelong follow-up.
  • Bone demineralization — chronic acidosis drives bone loss; consider DEXA.
  • Renal function — in a 43-patient predominantly pediatric cross-sectional study (median age 9), 74% had at least one sign of kidney injury (elevated BP, reduced eGFR, or proteinuria); recurrent UTI/bacteriuria in 44% and kidney or bladder stones in 29%.[19]
  • Adjacent EAU/ESPU neurogenic-bladder guidance — physical exam, renal ultrasound, blood-gas (pH and base excess), renal function, and vitamin B12 (if ileum used).[18]

See also the broader augmentation surveillance discussion on the transitional-urology hub.

Malignancy Risk and Surveillance​

Adults with BEEC have an elevated bladder-malignancy risk. The often-cited nearly 700-fold relative estimate comes from a historical 103-patient cohort born before 1964, with complete follow-up for only 61; it is not a contemporary absolute-risk prediction for all BEEC patients.[20][21]

  • Adenocarcinoma is the most common histology, though squamous cell and urothelial carcinoma also occur.[20][22]
  • Risk is highest with ureterosigmoidostomy or other diversions mixing urine and feces (38% benign or malignant neoplasia in the historical cohort). The reported 3.3% malignant-neoplasia rate in the group without mixing included bladder and kidney cancer; it is not a 3.3% bladder-cancer estimate.[20]
  • Persistent histological changes (cystitis glandularis, intestinal metaplasia, polyps) are found in up to 62% of exstrophic bladders after closure and may be premalignant.[23]
  • A matched congenital-bladder study (153 augmented and 153 controls) found no statistically significant cancer-incidence difference (4.6% vs 2.6%); sparse events do not establish equal risk. Transplant immunosuppression was associated with more malignancies.[24]
  • Lifelong specialist follow-up is warranted, with prompt evaluation of hematuria, unexplained recurrent symptomatic infection, pain or other concerning changes. The historical evidence does not establish a universally effective routine cystoscopy/cytology interval for all BEEC or augmented patients; agree an individualized plan. For a colorectal reservoir exposed to both urine and feces, the cited cohort supports annual endoscopic colorectal surveillance.[20]

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction​

Closing the anterior abdominal-wall defect in adults is a substantial challenge:

  • Closure without osteotomy is possible in selected adults — small series describe closure without pelvic osteotomy using the vesical-plate muscular coat and/or multilayered flap reconstruction.[25][26]
  • Multilayered reconstruction with superficial fascial and myofascial flaps (rectus anterior sheath, external oblique aponeurosis) gave reliable closure with no recurrent dehiscence in a 12-patient series.[26]
  • Primary abdominal-wall closure was achieved in 87% of untreated adults in one series.[12]

Genital Reconstruction in Males​

Penile inadequacy is a major adult concern:

  • Penoplasty (corporeal mobilization, chordee correction, dermal grafting) — required in most; 92% esthetic satisfaction in one series of 65, though 29% needed revision.[27]
  • Substitution phalloplasty — for severe inadequacy when local tissue is insufficient. The radial forearm free flap is the dominant technique (89% of cases in a systematic review), in 47 patients across seven low-quality studies. The reported 15% flap/procedure figure must not obscure urethroplasty complications in 12/22 (54%) and prosthesis complications in 8/32 (25%), mainly erosion.[28]
  • A 6-year institutional experience (11 phalloplasties; 8 CBE, 3 cloacal exstrophy) reported 100% flap survival, with inflatable penile prostheses placed in five; one fatal pulmonary embolism occurred in the pedicled anterolateral-thigh-flap group.[29]

Sexual Function and Fertility​

  • Sexual function scores (erectile and general) are often comparable to controls on validated questionnaires, yet more BEEC patients have not become sexually active (35% vs 11%) and fewer have children (22% vs 45%).[30][31]
  • Male fertility is frequently impaired — oligoasthenoteratozoospermia in ~71%, weak / dribbling ejaculation common, and ~50% of men who father children require assisted reproductive technology. Early sperm banking should be discussed.[32][33]
  • Female fertility is better preserved (up to 100% in one series), though obstetric management must account for pelvic anatomy and prior surgery.[34]
  • Genital reconstruction is frequently needed to optimize sexual outcomes — 96% of men and 25% of women in one series required such procedures.[34]

Pregnancy and Obstetric Management​

Pregnancy in women with BEEC is high-risk and requires multidisciplinary planning:

  • Fertility estimates vary considerably between small, selected cohorts; assess the individual reproductive anatomy and history. The older cross-sectional study reports internally inconsistent conception percentages and denominators in its abstract, so these should not be used as a precise counseling estimate.[35][34]
  • The miscarriage rate is high (~35%), with stillbirth / neonatal death in ~7%.[35]
  • Cesarean delivery is recommended in most cases — with complex exstrophy reconstruction — to protect reconstructed anatomy, though vaginal delivery has been reported in select cases.[35][36][37]
  • A systematic review covering 292 pregnancies across several reconstructed-bladder diagnoses, including exstrophy, reported febrile UTI in approximately 33% and upper-tract drainage in 11%; these are not BEEC-only estimates. Uterine prolapse is an additional concern.[35][38]
  • Delivery should occur at a tertiary center with urology coverage, with incision type and awareness of reconstructed reservoirs planned with the urological team in advance.[37][38]

Psychosocial and Quality of Life​

  • Generic QoL (SF-36 / RAND-36) is often comparable to the general population — though this may reflect adaptation rather than absence of burden.[31][39][40]
  • Mental-health concerns affect ~20%; depressive symptoms, anxiety, and low self-esteem around sexual relationships are common. Dissatisfaction with genital appearance and urinary incontinence are the strongest predictors of reduced QoL.[39][41][42]
  • Caregiver burden is significant (mean Zarit score 36.4), underscoring family-centered support.[41]
  • Multidisciplinary psychosocial support — behavioral health, peer support, educational consultation, and formal transition planning — is considered essential.[43]

Management of Previously Untreated Adults​

In resource-limited settings, some patients present with untreated BEEC in adulthood:

  • Continent catheterizable pouch (e.g., Penn pouch) — preferred by most patients, with excellent continence.[12]
  • Cystectomy with ileal conduit — simpler, for patients with limited healthcare access or inability or preference not to perform self-catheterization.[12][15]
  • Bladder preservation with ileocystoplasty and bladder-neck reconstruction — feasible if random biopsies show no significant dysplasia, with an individualized lifelong malignancy follow-up plan; this evidence is limited to four reported patients.[44]

Lifelong Surveillance​

DomainFrequencyMethod
Renal function + upper-tract imagingAnnuallySerum creatinine / eGFR, renal ultrasound[18][19]
Metabolic panel (if bowel incorporated)Every 6–12 monthsRenal function, electrolytes/bicarbonate and B12 when ileal risk is present; blood gas if needed to clarify acid-base status[18]
Malignancy surveillancePer riskIndividualized BEEC plan and symptom-triggered investigation; annual colorectal endoscopy for urine–feces reservoirs[20]
Stomal assessmentEach visitInspect stoma, troubleshoot catheterization[16]
Sexual / reproductive healthPeriodicallyCounseling; early sperm banking for males; semen analysis if fertility desired[32][33]
Obstetric planningChildbearing agePre-pregnancy multidisciplinary planning; tertiary-center delivery[37]
Psychosocial / mental healthPeriodicallyScreening + validated QoL instruments[40][43]

Key Principles​

  • Continence usually outlasts the native bladder. Only ~21–25% void per urethra long-term; most end up on CIC, and ~70% need augmentation or diversion by adulthood.[4][5][6]
  • Observed continence was 93% after bladder neck closure plus channel versus 64% after isolated BNR in one selected cohort; this does not establish a universal preferred operation.[4]
  • Bowel reconstruction requires lifelong follow-up for metabolic, stone and other complications. BEEC-related cancer risk is not attributable solely to bowel incorporation.[18][20]
  • Selected adult abdominal-wall defects can be closed without osteotomy; small series cannot determine the best approach for every pelvis.[25][26]
  • Discuss fertility early — male fertility is often impaired (ART in ~50% of fathers; offer sperm banking); female fertility is better preserved but pregnancy is high-risk and usually delivered by cesarean at a tertiary center.[32][35][37]
  • Genital appearance and incontinence drive QoL — address them proactively alongside mental-health screening and caregiver support.[41][43]

See Also​

References​

1. Ebert AK, Reutter H, Ludwig M, Rösch WH. "The Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:23. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-4-23

2. Wood D, Baird A, Carmignani L, et al. "Lifelong Congenital Urology: The Challenges for Patients and Surgeons." Eur Urol. 2019;75(6):1001-1007. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.019

3. Lee T, Borer J. "Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." Urol Clin North Am. 2023;50(3):403-414. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2023.04.004

4. Maruf M, Manyevitch R, Michaud J, et al. "Urinary Continence Outcomes in Classic Bladder Exstrophy: A Long-Term Perspective." J Urol. 2020;203(1):200-205. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000505

5. Abdellaoui S, Cazzorla F, Morel-Journel N, et al. "Long-Term Urinary Outcomes in Classic Bladder Exstrophy: Results of an Extensive Follow-Up." BJU Int. 2025;135(6):1018-1024. doi:10.1111/bju.16680

6. Szymanski KM, Fuchs M, McLeod D, et al. "Probability of Bladder Augmentation, Diversion and Clean Intermittent Catheterization in Classic Bladder Exstrophy: A 36-Year, Multi-Institutional, Retrospective Cohort Study." J Urol. 2019;202(6):1256-1262. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000552

7. Taskinen S, Suominen JS. "Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in Patients in Adulthood With Bladder Exstrophy and Epispadias." BJU Int. 2013;111(7):1124-1129. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11756.x

8. Burki T, Hamid R, Duffy P, et al. "Long-Term Followup of Patients After Redo Bladder Neck Reconstruction for Bladder Exstrophy Complex." J Urol. 2006;176(3):1138-1141. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.055

9. Polm PD, Christiaans CHH, Dik P, Wyndaele MIA, de Kort LMO. "Continent Catheterizable Urinary Channels: Lessons for Lifelong Urological Care From a Comparative Analysis of Very Long-Term Complications and Revision-Free Survival of Three Different Types." Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(5):1083-1089. doi:10.1002/nau.25350

10. Fiorenza V, Hukkinen M, Alova I, et al. "Dextranomer Endoscopic Injections for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." J Urol. 2023;209(3):591-599. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003086

11. Light JK, Scott FB. "Treatment of the Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex With the AS792 Artificial Urinary Sphincter." J Urol. 1983;129(4):738-740. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52336-8

12. Kiran PS, Panaiyadiyan S, Singh P, et al. "Management of Untreated Classical Bladder Exstrophy in Adults: A Single-Institutional Experience." Urology. 2020;146:293-298. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.009

13. Polm PD, Wyndaele MIA, de Kort LMO. "Very Long-Term Follow-Up of Indiana Pouches Proves Durability." Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(5):1090-1096. doi:10.1002/nau.25344

14. Rubenwolf PC, Hampel C, Roos F, et al. "Continent Anal Urinary Diversion in Classic Bladder Exstrophy: 45-Year Experience." Urology. 2017;100:249-254. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.026

15. Venkatramani V, Chandrasingh J, Devasia A, Kekre NS. "Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex Presenting in Adulthood: A Single-Center Review of Presentation, Management, and Outcomes." Urology. 2014;84(5):1243-1247. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.063

16. Harris TGW, Haffar A, Crigger CB, et al. "Stomal Stenosis After Continent Urinary Diversion in Bladder Exstrophy: Risk Factors and Management." Urology. 2024;191:110-118. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.07.003

17. Surer I, Ferrer FA, Baker LA, Gearhart JP. "Continent Urinary Diversion and the Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." J Urol. 2003;169(3):1102-1105. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000044921.19074.d0

18. Stein R, Bogaert G, Dogan HS, et al. "EAU/ESPU Guidelines on the Management of Neurogenic Bladder in Children and Adolescent Part II: Operative Management." Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):498-506. doi:10.1002/nau.24248

19. Cleper R, Blumenthal D, Beniamini Y, et al. "Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex: Are the Kidneys and Kidney Function Spared?" Pediatr Nephrol. 2023;38(8):2711-2717. doi:10.1007/s00467-023-05889-y

20. Smeulders N, Woodhouse CR. "Neoplasia in Adult Exstrophy Patients." BJU Int. 2001;87(7):623-628. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02136.x

21. Woodhouse CR, North AC, Gearhart JP. "Standing the Test of Time: Long-Term Outcome of Reconstruction of the Exstrophy Bladder." World J Urol. 2006;24(3):244-249. doi:10.1007/s00345-006-0053-7

22. Rieder JM, Parsons JK, Gearhart JP, Schoenberg M. "Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Unreconstructed Exstrophic Bladder." Urology. 2006;67(1):199. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.008

23. Rubenwolf PC, Eder F, Ebert AK, et al. "Persistent Histological Changes in the Exstrophic Bladder After Primary Closure — a Cause for Concern?" J Urol. 2013;189(2):671-677. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.210

24. Higuchi TT, Granberg CF, Fox JA, Husmann DA. "Augmentation Cystoplasty and Risk of Neoplasia: Fact, Fiction and Controversy." J Urol. 2010;184(6):2492-2496. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.038

25. Mansour AM, Sarhan OM, Helmy TE, et al. "Management of Bladder Exstrophy Epispadias Complex in Adults: Is Abdominal Closure Possible Without Osteotomy?" World J Urol. 2010;28(2):199-204. doi:10.1007/s00345-009-0436-7

26. Azhati B, Dilixiati D, Reheman A, Li W, Yu Y. "An Analysis of the Efficacy of Multilayered Repair and Reconstruction Using Combined Tissue Pedicle Flaps for Abdominal Wall Defects in Adult Bladder Exstrophy Patients." Ann Plast Surg. 2024;92(4):437-441. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003844

27. VanderBrink BA, Stock JA, Hanna MK. "Esthetic Outcomes of Genitoplasty in Males Born With Bladder Exstrophy and Epispadias." J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1606-1610. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.192

28. Berrettini A, Sampogna G, Gnech M, et al. "Substitution Phalloplasty in Patients With Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Complications and Outcomes." J Sex Med. 2021;18(2):400-409. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.007

29. Harris TGW, Manyevitch R, Wu WJ, et al. "Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty for Penile Reconstruction in Patients With Bladder Exstrophy." J Urol. 2021;205(3):880-887. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001404

30. Suominen JS, Santtila P, Taskinen S. "Sexual Function in Patients Operated on for Bladder Exstrophy and Epispadias." J Urol. 2015;194(1):195-199. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.098

31. Zhu X, Klijn AJ, de Kort LMO. "Urological, Sexual, and Quality of Life Evaluation of Adult Patients With Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex: Long-Term Results From a Dutch Cohort." Urology. 2020;136:272-277. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.011

32. Rubenwolf P, Thomas C, Thüroff JW, Stein R. "Sexual Function, Social Integration and Paternity of Males With Classic Bladder Exstrophy Following Urinary Diversion." J Urol. 2016;195(2):465-470. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.076

33. Reynaud N, Courtois F, Mouriquand P, et al. "Male Sexuality, Fertility, and Urinary Continence in Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." J Sex Med. 2018;15(3):314-323. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.004

34. Sinatti C, Waterschoot M, Roth J, et al. "Long-Term Sexual Outcomes in Patients With Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex." Int J Impot Res. 2021;33(2):164-169. doi:10.1038/s41443-020-0248-2

35. Deans R, Banks F, Liao LM, et al. "Reproductive Outcomes in Women With Classic Bladder Exstrophy: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study." Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):496.e1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.016

36. Lachica R, Chan Y, Uquillas KR, Lee RH. "Vaginal Delivery After Dührssen Incisions in a Patient With Bladder Exstrophy and Uterine Prolapse." Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(4):689-692. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001938

37. Hosiani A, Smet ME, Nayyar R. "A Road Map for the Management of a Pregnancy Complicated by Maternal Bladder Exstrophy." BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):195. doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06316-2

38. Bey E, Perrouin-Verbe B, Reiss B, et al. "Outcomes of Pregnancy and Delivery in Women With Continent Lower Urinary Tract Reconstruction: Systematic Review of the Literature." Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1707-1717. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04856-1

39. Taskinen S, Suominen JS, Mattila AK. "Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health in Adolescents and Adults Operated for Bladder Exstrophy and Epispadias." Urology. 2015;85(6):1515-1519. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.020

40. Dellenmark-Blom M, Sjöström S, Abrahamsson K, Holmdahl G. "Health-Related Quality of Life Among Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research." Qual Life Res. 2019;28(6):1389-1412. doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02119-7

41. Bakır AC, Emül HM, Eliçevik M, et al. "Psychological and Sexual Outcomes in Patients With Bladder Exstrophy and Their Caregivers." J Pediatr Surg. 2026;61(3):162832. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162832

42. Traceviciute J, Zwink N, Jenetzky E, et al. "Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Adult Male Individuals With Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex — a Survey of the German CURE-Network." Urology. 2018;112:215-221. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.063

43. Haddad E, Hayes LC, Price D, et al. "Ensuring Our Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex Patients and Families Thrive." Pediatr Nephrol. 2024;39(2):371-382. doi:10.1007/s00467-023-06049-y

44. Pathak HR, Mahajan R, Ali NI, Kaul S, Andankar MG. "Bladder Preservation in Adult Classic Exstrophy: Early Results of Four Patients." Urology. 2001;57(5):906-910. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00959-1