Skip to main content

Vesicocutaneous Fistula Repair

This is the surgical-technique atlas for vesicocutaneous fistula (VCF). For definitions, classification by cutaneous opening (suprapubic, inguinoscrotal, perineal, thigh), etiology (pelvic-fracture extraperitoneal bladder rupture, iatrogenic, suprapubic-catheter complications, inguinoscrotal hernia, radiation, neurogenic bladder, malignancy), pathogenesis (the four-factor non-closure framework plus radiation-induced ischemia), clinical presentation, and diagnostic evaluation (indigo carmine, CT cystography, fistulography, cystoscopy), see the clinical-conditions page: Vesicocutaneous Fistula. This page focuses on the stepwise repair framework, surgical repair options, and outcomes.


Stepwise Repair Framework

VCF management is staged in three sequential phases. Most patients pass through Stage 1 (decompression / sepsis control); a subset closes without operation; the rest progress to Stage 2 (minimally invasive bridge or definitive endoscopic closure) and/or Stage 3 (open fistulectomy with multilayer closure and tissue interposition).[1][2][3]

StageGoalModalities
1. Conservative / temporizingSepsis control, urinary diversion, wound preparationLarge-bore (≥ 18 Fr) urethral Foley ± percutaneous nephrostomy, broad-spectrum antibiotics, abscess drainage, nutrition
2. Bridge / minimally invasivePromote spontaneous closure or downsize before definitive repairVAC (negative-pressure wound therapy), transurethral suture cystorrhaphy
3. Definitive surgical repairEradicate the tract and restore bladder integrityFistulectomy + multilayer bladder closure ± partial cystectomy ± tissue interposition (omental, muscle, free flap)

Stage 1 — Conservative Catheter Drainage

Appropriate for small, uncomplicated fistulae without distal obstruction, foreign body, intracavitary calculus, or malignancy. Continuous bladder decompression diverts urine from the tract and allows epithelialization to reverse.[4]

  • Large-bore (≥ 18 Fr) urethral Foley for a minimum of 7 days, with cystography to confirm healing before removal
  • Addition of percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteric stenting if bladder drainage alone is insufficient
  • Topical wound care with stoma adhesive / barrier paste to prevent skin maceration
  • Treatment of any underlying driver (foreign body, distal obstruction, infection, anti-angiogenic therapy)

Spontaneous closure is achievable when the bladder is fully decompressed and the tract is not epithelialized — a sunitinib-related VCF closed simply with discontinuation of the anti-angiogenic agent.[5]


Stage 2 — VAC and Minimally Invasive Closure

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)

VAC (negative-pressure wound therapy) controls urine exposure, removes excess fluid, reduces edema, promotes granulation tissue, and approximates wound edges. It has been used in two complementary roles:[1][6]

  • Definitive therapy — a pediatric VCF after augmentation cystoplasty closed with VAC alone without further surgery[1]
  • Preoperative bridge — VAC downsizes the wound and improves tissue quality before definitive flap reconstruction of large complex defects[6]

Bladder must remain continuously decompressed (urethral or suprapubic catheter) while VAC is in place. Dressing changes every 48–72 h; surrounding skin protected with hydrocolloid barrier.

Transurethral (endoscopic) suture cystorrhaphy

Cystoscopically assisted closure of the intravesical opening with intracorporeal suturing has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative in selected vesicovaginal and vesicocutaneous fistulae, avoiding open surgery.[7] Best suited to small, fresh, non-irradiated tracts with healthy surrounding mucosa.

Percutaneous catheter management

For VCF arising around a malpositioned or extruded suprapubic catheter, exchange to a properly anchored small-caliber suprapubic tube with simultaneous urethral Foley drainage can allow the parastomal tract to contract and close.[8]


Stage 3 — Definitive Surgical Repair

Required for complex, chronic, or refractory VCF and for any fistula with distal obstruction, epithelialized tract, foreign body, malignancy, or radiation injury.[2][9]

Fistulectomy with multilayer bladder closure

  1. Tract excision — circumferential excision of the cutaneous opening and the entire fibrotic tract down to the bladder wall; submit specimen for histology to exclude malignancy
  2. Bladder mobilization — develop perivesical planes to allow tension-free closure
  3. Partial cystectomy — when the bladder wall around the fistula is extensively damaged, irradiated, or carcinomatous, excise involved bladder wall as a wedge[2]
  4. Multilayer closure — two-layer absorbable closure: full-thickness inner layer (running 3-0 absorbable) and seromuscular imbricating outer layer (interrupted 3-0 absorbable), with watertight test
  5. Catheter drainage — large-bore urethral Foley ± suprapubic tube for 10–14 days; cystogram before removal

Tissue interposition

The central principle for complex or recurrent VCF. Local tissue around a chronic VCF is fibrotic, ischemic, and unsuitable for primary healing; vascularized non-irradiated tissue must be brought in to separate the bladder closure from the skin closure.[2][6][10]

FlapBest for / indication
Omental flapFirst-line for most abdominopelvic VCF; pedicled on right or left gastroepiploic
Rectus abdominis (VRAM / pedicled)Large suprapubic / lower-abdominal defects with skin and fascial loss
Rectus femoris musculocutaneousThigh / inguinal VCF; described for a huge VCF combined with VAC[6]
GracilisPerineal and inguinoscrotal VCF; thin pliable workhorse
Perivesical fat / peritoneal flapSmall suprapubic defects with adequate adjacent tissue
Free tissue transfer (latissimus dorsi + serratus anterior bipedicled)Extensive radiation-induced VCF with combined bladder and abdominal-wall defect; reconstructed both layers with no recurrence at 4 months in the Ludolph case[10]

Layered closure with overlying tissue coverage for extensive trauma

For extensive suprapubic post-traumatic VCF with loss of skin, fascia, and muscle, simple bladder closure alone fails — successful repair requires muscle and fascial flap coverage to reconstruct each layer of the abdominal wall over the closed bladder, as demonstrated in the Bockrath series.[11]


Special Considerations

Pelvic-fracture extraperitoneal bladder rupture

Extraperitoneal rupture occurs in 60–90% of pelvic fractures with bladder injury; complex extraperitoneal injuries can drive urine extravasation along tissue planes to skin, with delayed VCF presentation up to 7 years post-injury and up to 2 years when presenting as a thigh abscess.[12][13] Once a tract is established, spontaneous closure is rare and most patients require fistulectomy with interposition.

Radiation-induced VCF

The most challenging subset because local irradiated tissue cannot support healing:[14][10][15]

  • Conservative treatment is generally ineffective for established radiation-induced fistulae
  • Non-irradiated, well-vascularized interposition tissue is mandatory — omental flap as a minimum; free-flap reconstruction may be necessary
  • Permanent urinary diversion (ileal conduit or continent diversion) is often the most practical option when tissue quality is poor or life expectancy limited
  • Prior radiotherapy is a strong predictor of surgical failure — 75% failure in irradiated patients vs. 10.8% in non-irradiated patients (p = 0.012) in a 14-year urogenital-fistula series[15]

Neurogenic-bladder VCF

The chronic high-pressure state must be addressed before or concurrent with fistula repair. In the Raup series of 21 patients with neurogenic-bladder urinary-cutaneous fistulae:[16]

  • 13 underwent surgical repair, but 9 of 13 (69%) ultimately required permanent urinary diversion despite repair
  • 8 underwent primary urinary diversion at presentation
  • 81% (17/21) required permanent urinary diversion overall — suprapubic tube (53%), ileal conduit (23%), condom catheter (18%), or perineal urethrostomy (6%)

In this population, primary urinary diversion ± bladder reconstruction (augmentation, bladder neck closure) is often a more durable answer than fistulectomy alone.

Malignancy-associated VCF

Bladder, colorectal, or other pelvic tumors with direct invasion require oncologic management as the primary intervention; reconstructive repair is generally deferred until disease control is achieved. The sunitinib-associated VCF that closed on drug withdrawal is a reminder to interrogate anti-angiogenic exposure in any patient with new fistula formation on systemic therapy.[5]


Outcomes

  • Post-traumatic VCF — outcomes scale with extent of tissue loss; simple defects close with layered repair and overlying tissue coverage, while extensive defects may require staged reconstruction.[11]
  • Post-surgical VCF — generally favorable when diagnosed early and managed with diversion ± VAC; spontaneous closure achievable with adequate decompression.[1]
  • Radiation-induced VCF — worst prognosis among etiologies; 75% surgical failure in irradiated tissue, with permanent diversion often required.[14][10][15]
  • Neurogenic-bladder VCF81% require permanent diversion despite repair attempts.[16]
  • Overall specialist-series outcomes — primary success ~80.6%, definitive closure ~92.5%; predictors of failure include prior RT, oncologic etiology, and prolonged delay to repair (12 vs. 6 months, p = 0.027).[15]

Key Takeaways

  • VCF management follows a three-stage framework — decompression, minimally invasive bridge or definitive endoscopic closure, then open repair
  • Small, fresh, non-epithelialized tracts can close with catheter drainage alone or VAC; an epithelialized tract requires fistulectomy
  • Tissue interposition is the central principle of definitive repair — omental flap is first-line; muscle and free flaps for complex / radiation / large defects
  • Radiation and neurogenic-bladder VCF carry the worst surgical prognoses; permanent urinary diversion is frequently the most durable answer
  • Always investigate for distal obstruction, foreign body, calculus, malignancy, and anti-angiogenic drug exposure as drivers that must be addressed for any repair to succeed

References

1. Elizondo RA, Au JK, Gargollo PC, Tu DT. "Vacuum-Assisted Closure of a Vesicocutaneous Fistula in a Pediatric Patient After Bladder Cystoplasty." Urology. 2016;95:190–191. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.001

2. Kosaka T, Asano T, Azuma R, et al. "A Case of Vesicocutaneous Fistula to the Thigh." Urology. 2009;73(4):929.e7–8. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.04.063

3. Shackley DC, Brew CJ, Bryden AA, et al. "The Staged Management of Complex Entero-Urinary Fistulae." BJU Int. 2000;86(6):624–629. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00871.x

4. Johnsen N, Wessells H, Archer-Arroyo K, et al. "Best Practices Guidelines: Management of Genitourinary Injuries." American College of Surgeons. 2025.

5. Watanabe K, Otsu S, Morinaga R, et al. "Vesicocutaneous Fistula Formation During Treatment With Sunitinib Malate: Case Report." BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:128. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-10-128

6. Katsuragi Y, Ueda K, Kajikawa A, Tateshita T, Okochi H. "Repair of a Huge Vesicocutaneous Fistula With the Rectus Femoris Musculocutaneous Flap and VAC." J Wound Care. 2010;19(4):157–159. doi:10.12968/jowc.2010.19.4.157

7. McKay HA. "Vesicovaginal and Vesicocutaneous Fistulas: Transurethral Suture Cystorrhaphy as a New Closure Technique." J Urol. 1997;158(4):1513–1516. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64256-3

8. Vaidyanathan S, Hughes PL, Soni BM. "Unusual Complication of Suprapubic Cystostomy in a Male Patient With Tetraplegia." ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:1575–1578. doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.253

9. Gill HS. "Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Uroenteric Fistula." Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96(3):583–592. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.012

10. Ludolph I, Apel H, Horch RE, Beier JP. "Treatment of a Chronic Vesicocutaneous Fistula and Abdominal Wall Defect After Resection of a Soft Tissue Sarcoma Using a Bipedicled Latissimus Dorsi and Serratus Anterior Free Flap." Int J Urol. 2014;21(11):1178–1180. doi:10.1111/iju.12545

11. Bockrath JM, Nanninga JB, Lewis VL, Grayhack JT. "Extensive Suprapubic Vesicocutaneous Fistula Following Trauma." J Urol. 1981;125(2):246–248. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54989-7

12. Banihani MN, Al-Azab RS, Waqfi NR, Kharashgah MN, Al Manasra AR. "Vesicocutaneous Fistula Presenting as a Thigh Abscess." Singapore Med J. 2009;50(9):e336–e337.

13. Coccolini F, Moore EE, Kluger Y, et al. "Kidney and Uro-Trauma: WSES-AAST Guidelines." World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:54. doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0274-x

14. Lau KO, Cheng C. "A Case Report — Delayed Vesicocutaneous Fistula After Radiation Therapy for Advanced Vulvar Cancer." Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998;27(5):705–706.

15. Zhang C, Saussine C, Tricard T. "Urogenital Fistulas: Surgical Management, Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors: A 14-Year Monocentric Experience." Int Urogynecol J. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00192-026-06580-0

16. Raup VT, Eswara JR, Weese JR, Potretzke AM, Brandes SB. "Urinary-Cutaneous Fistulae in Patients With Neurogenic Bladder." Urology. 2015;86(6):1222–1226. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.057